Vermont and New York mark one-year since Champlain Bridge closure

first_imgVermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) Secretary David Dill and New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) Acting Commissioner Stanley Gee this week marked the one year anniversary of the Lake Champlain Bridge closure on October 16 of last year, noting the significant progress made to provide travelers, especially those located in the vicinity of the bridge and dependent on transportation across the lake in their daily lives, with a link across Lake Champlain between Crown Point, NY, and Addison, VT. Today, the temporary ferry service is still in place providing round-the-clock transportation across the lake at no cost to passengers, and the underwater structures for the new bridge are nearly completed. Immediately following the bridge’s closure, New York and Vermont reached out to the surrounding communities through a series of public meetings to gather feedback and solicit input from residents and business owners on both sides of the lake. The states quickly began implementing the communities’ clear vision for restoring the corridor with a temporary ferry in the vicinity of the bridge and a brand new Lake Champlain Bridge at the same location. Community participation was crucial to choosing the site for the temporary ferry and for picking the design of the replacement bridge.VTrans Secretary Dill said “Opening the temporary ferry as quickly as possible was key to restoring the lives of both New Yorkers and Vermonters back to as close to normal as possible given the circumstances, and I am heartened at to hear from both residents and business owners that family life and economic vitality on both sides of the lake has rebounded significantly since the first ferry set sail. But as welcome as the ferry has been, we also realize that nothing short of opening the new bridge will completely restore our communities. To that end, everyone can rest assured that bridge construction will continue nonstop through the winter so that we can reestablish this vital economic, social and public-safety link as quickly as possible.”NYSDOT Acting Commissioner Gee said, “The New York State Department of Transportation, working with the Vermont Agency of Transportation, took the necessary steps to assure the safety of the traveling public when we closed the Lake Champlain Bridge. This bridge was an important piece of transportation infrastructure that connected people with employment, education and medical care. Responding to the need for this transportation link, NYSDOT and Vermont moved immediately to restore the connection with temporary ferry service while the permanent replacement bridge was being designed. I thank all of our partners for their hard work and dedication on this project, and I especially thank the communities on both sides of Lake Champlain for their input and patience as we build a new, state-of-the-art bridge to replace the former historic structure in this location.”Cracking in the bridge’s support piers prompted the closure and, if left untreated, could have led to structural failure and possible collapse, putting motorists and pedestrians in serious danger. By immediately closing the bridge, New York and Vermont were able to ensure the safety of the traveling public.The original Lake Champlain Bridge was demolished on December 28, 2009. While planning the complex demolition, the states also worked on building infrastructure to accommodate a temporary ferry. The ferry, carrying motorists across Lake Champlain every 15 minutes, opened in January of 2010. In the meantime, the two states worked on designing a replacement bridge to be located in the footprint of the old bridge. Several public meetings were held in New York and Vermont and the public was invited to vote in person and on-line on their preferred bridge design. The publicly preferred design – a Modified Network Tied Arch Bridge built of steel with an arch along the center span – was ultimately chosen to replace the Lake Champlain Bridge.Construction on the new bridge began in June, a short eight months after closing the bridge to traffic. Work has progressed on-schedule, with construction of bridge abutments and piers under way. Fabrication of the steel bridge members is progressing off-site. The project is on track to be completed next September, as scheduled. Source: VTrans. 10.16.2010. Photo by Ed Barna, Vermont Business Magazine.###last_img read more

WWE SummerSlam 2019 match grades: Seth Rollins vs. Brock Lesnar steals show, rest of card underwhelms

first_imgHere are match grades and a recap, courtesy of SN’s Steven Muehlhausen and Andreas Hale.Join DAZN and watch more than 100 fight nights a yearWWE Summerslam GradesDrew Gulak def. Oney Lorcan to retain WWE cruiserweight title  Muehlhausen: Have to feel bad for Gulak and Lorcan. They worked hard, but the fans didn’t care until the final moments when Lorcan was making his comeback before coming up short, and Gulak won to a minimal reaction.The tricky thing is the matter of WWE not showing they care about the division so hence why should the fans?Grade: CHale: I don’t know what to make of this 205 Live situation. For whatever reason, the best matches are on the weekly shows that nobody watches. And then they get a chance to open up a PPV and deliver a standard affair match that nobody is into. They need to figure this out.Grade: CBuddy Murphy def. Apollo Crews by disqualification Muehlhausen: You see the names and think if they are given time and have a story behind it, we’d see a good match. However, the match was thrown together with no backstory and was only used to get Erick Rowan involved to attack Murphy on the outside to cause the DQ.Grade: DHale: This was what it was. And what it ended up being was a vehicle to get Rowan involved. Yuck.Grade: D-Alexa Bliss and Nikki Cross def. The IIconics to retain the Women’s Tag titlesMuehlhausen: The bar was low heading into this one, but they exceeded expectations due to Bliss and Cross. Some of the moves by Billie Kay were executed too slow, and Peyton Royce was clunky in spots. But to be fair, The IIconics are improving but at a slow rate.Grade: DHale: As much fun as the IIconics are outside of the ring, they are just as bad inside of it. I’m also tired of Alexa and Nikki’s relationship. Having these four in a match and no sign of Asuka, Kairi Sane, Naomi or anybody else that matters made this a clunky affair. Pass.Grade: D Becky Lynch def. Natalya to retain the Raw Women’s title Muehlhausen: Good booking to start the show with the star of the company in Lynch and Natalya being from Canada. The crowd, for the most part, were into both females, which enhanced the bout.But it was still hard to envision Natalya winning because of Lynch being the top female wrestler in the company. The one thing Natalya gave Lynch is credibility because she’s a great worker and her moves are crisp, which made this Lynch’s best in-ring work since she won the belt at Wrestlemania from Ronda Rousey. The knock on the match was when they exchanged their respective finishers, and Lynch popped up from the sharpshooter after being in agony for over two minutes into the dis-arm-her like it was no big deal.The question now is what’s next for Lynch? She’s running out of credible opponents because she needs those to legitimize her as a draw. Lynch’s lost steam after going from Rousey to Lacey Evans but picked a bit of it back up with Natalya.Grade: BHale: Plain and simple: Babyfaces don’t lose submission matches so the drama was sucked out of this one the moment the bell rang. Aside from that, it was solid work and storytelling from the two as Nattie and Becky traded submission holds. The rationale behind the booking was that Nattie would be over in Canada, and that wasn’t the case. So we ended up with a cool match that could have main evented RAW. Meanwhile, we’re waiting for Becky Lynch to have the feud that she needs as her title run has been pretty ho-hum. Grade: C+Goldberg def. Dolph Ziggler Muehlhausen: Predictably, WWE kept it short, quick and to the point. Ziggler showed great fire by putting it all into those three superkicks. Goldberg gives the best spear in the history of pro wrestling. He puts everything into it, which makes people love the move even more. We could have done without Ziggler continuing to egging on Goldberg to come back to the ring only to suffer another spear.Grade: DHale:  I mean, what did you expect?Grade: C-AJ Styles def. Ricochet to retain the U.S. title Muehlhausen: A pretty good contest but one that could have used another five minutes as Styles and Ricochet were starting to get into a rhythm even though the flip off of the top rope and catch by Styles into the Styles Clash was quite breathtaking. Ricochet is a phenomenal talent and the best athlete WWE’s had in recent memory.He checks all the marks needed to be the “face” of the company, which made Styles winning more surprising.With that said, what do you do with him now? Hopefully, he doesn’t get lost in the shuffle and tossed to the side.Grade: B+Hale:  Not enough can be said about Ricochet as an in-ring performer. The psychology sold on the leg injury was fantastic —  punctuated by an impressive springboard clothesline off of one leg — and had the fans completely bought in on Ricochet pulling off the victory. Unfortunately, this was a bit too short to reach the levels that most thought it would as Styles caught Ricochet coming off the top rope for a beautiful Styles Clash to pin him clean as a sheet and retain. These two could have definitely been given more time to steal the show. That being said, it was still a very good match. The real question is where Ricochet goes from here. Grade: BBayley def. Ember Moon to retain the Smackdown women’s title Muehlhausen: Bayley and Moon are talented workers, but the program didn’t stand a chance after Moon lost on Smackdown to Alexa Bless. The work was solid, and they did nothing wrong in the ring. The crowd gave them no reaction, including the excellent Bayley-to-belly suplex from the top rope for the win.It’s a shame Moon got her legs cut from underneath as the fans would have been behind her more.Grade: CHale: This was a weird one. Ember Moon is extremely talented but is missing something that keeps her disconnected from the fans. Bayley has kind of been treading water despite being the champion and needs the right dance partner to bring out the best in her. What ended up happening was a serviceable, yet relatively tame match between the two that lacked any real drama. Ember Moon looked good but nobody cared and we didn’t get a serious threat to the title. I guess we can just move on. Grade: D+Kevin Owens def. Shane McMahon Muehlhausen: There wasn’t a doubt Owens because of the stipulation if he lost then he would have to leave WWE. Retirements in WWE are as firm as toilet paper.The crowd was behind their fellow Canadian throughout. Unfortunately, there was too much interference from special enforcer Elias. Let’s pray McMahon is gone since he finally lost and is no longer the “Best in the World.” While a good character, his in-ring work is long in the tooth.Grade: CHale: An extended squash match that saw Kevin Owens pretty much dominate Shane McMahon from bell to bell while getting in some underhanded tactics to keep his edge despite being a babyface. Owens is really, really good at just about everything and this match hopefully served as an appetizer of what’s to come. The match itself ended up being relatively ordinary with an unnecessary injection of Elias to stack the deck. Hopefully, this means that Shane will take some time off. This was fine. Grade: CCharlotte Flair def. Trish Stratus Muehlhausen: A pretty good affair that really picked up in the last ten minutes after a slow beginning. Give Flair a ton of credit. She got the crowd to get behind Stratus which in turn helped Stratus get going as she looked extraordinarily tentative and sold every Stratus move like a million bucks.Surprised Stratus tapped out to the figure-eight leglock. But that’s what a veteran does to further establish their opponent in what was a ringing endorsement of how Stratus views Flair.Grade: BHale: There was really no rhyme or reason for this match to happen aside from Trish being from Canada and wanting one last match. That being said, it was a match that worked perfectly fine considering that Stratus hadn’t worked a match like this in years and Charlotte played the role of ring general to a tee. It had a very dead middle section where Trish was working from underneath and Charlotte eventually worked her magic to bring the crowd back to life with some well placed in-ring commentary when she got the upper hand. Business picked up when Stratus slapped on the Figure-Eight and sent the crowd into a frenzy. But the right woman won because Charlotte certainly doesn’t need to lose to a legend at this stage of her career. Grade: C+Kofi Kingston and Randy Orton battle to a countout Muehlhausen: Yes, you read that right. A countout in a WWE title match on the third most significant event of the year for the organization. For a great build featuring tremendous video packages, Kingston and Orton were stuck in neutral until right at the end when Kingston went for another frog splash from the top rope, but Orton turned around and hit a beautiful RKO. Kingston rolled to the outside where his family was ringside, and Orton stared at them intently that resulted in the countout.The fans booed loudly at their disapproval of the non-finish. They paid to see a good match with a conclusion. Instead, WWE took the cheap way out. It’s going to be hard to get the people back after what happened here.Grade: CHale:  Just when this match began to hit its stride as Orton caught Kofi in midair off the top rope with an RKO, we get a…*checks notes*DOUBLE COUNTOUT???I understand that they want to extend this feud with a proper build but you do that finish at a PPV like Extreme Rules, Backlash or something. Not one of the Big 4. Totally unacceptable.Grade: C-Bray Wyatt def. Finn Balor Muehlhausen: What everyone expected to happen took place in Wyatt squashing the former Universal champion.The entrance was a remix of his old theme, and the Leatherface type of mask is a sight to see.The potential is there for Wyatt to become a main event player once again. Wyatt is over with fans but can WWE let the character grow?Grade: CHale:  This grade isn’t as much about the match as it is the presentation. The WWE has flubbed the Bray Wyatt character so many times and there was concern about how this would go over when he finally debuted.Well, this was about as pitch-perfect as it gets. He ran roughshod over Balor, who is expected to take a vacation. Everything about this felt spectacular. The entrance, his moveset, ring attire (complete with a lantern made with a mold of his face on it) and the altering of his finish to the Mandible Claw was 100% on the money. My only concern moving forward is how the WWE will keep from overexposing him. Let it breathe and feel special. Grade: ASeth Rollins def. Brock Lesnar to win the Universal title Muehlhausen: By far the best match on the show. Rollins and Lesnar delivered a high octane battle with no rest whatsoever.I know it’s probably an unpopular because of the disdain for Lesnar, but the wrong guy won. If you’re going to beat Lesnar, it should be for someone WWE is trying to establish as a headliner, not someone whose already in the position. Rollins didn’t deliver when he beat Lesnar the first time around at Wrestlemania as his programs with AJ Styles and Baron Corbin were flat and ended up losing a lot of steam. Maybe Rollins proves the doubters wrong and goes on historic title reign as he has the talent to do it.Grade: A-Hale: Say what you want about Lesnar, but when he shows up, he provides an electricity like no other. Couple that with the WWE figuring out a formula where every Lesnar match starts off with a bang that leaves fans in awe, and you have the perfect recipe for the Lesnar-Rollins rematch.  WWE Summerslam took place on Sunday from the Scotiabank Arena in Toronto.The WWE’s blockbuster event of the summer and third biggest show of the annual year felt like an average episode of Monday Night Raw until Seth Rollins and Brock Lesnar came through with a dynamic main event that saw Rollins slay the beast one more time to capture the Univeral championship. This was what we needed in a PPV that was solid, yet unimpressive. Lesnar nearly getting stopped in the opening minutes, Rollins backflipping out of German Suplexes, a table spot outside the ring and a few near falls. There was drama and non-stop action. No, it’s not a match of the year contender, but it was damn good to see. Hopefully, Rollins’ run with the Universal title will be much better than the last one. Grade: B+last_img read more

Council member Valentine asks for independent audit; rest of council says no

first_imgby Tracy McCue, Sumner Newscow — The depletion of the City of Wellington utility reserve fund has raised more than a few eyebrows (see story here), and councilman Jim Valentine’s motion for an independent audit may have raised a few more.Jim ValentineOn a night for which he was re-elected for another four years, Valentine during the council correspondence portion of Tuesday’s meeting made a formal motion:“I’ve got a lot of questions from people around town about the so called ‘lost money.’ So I’m going to ask for a motion for an outside audit of all expenses from 2011 to 2014 including 2012 and 2013. We need to to put this thing to bed.”The motion would eventually die from a lack of second. But before doing so, it still made for an interesting six-minute discussion.Wellington council member Vince Wetta asked Wellington City Clerk Shane Shields, if there was lost money, or was this a case of money being transferred from one account to the other.Shields said money transferred out of the utility fund was used for operating services as was outlined in the making of the 2014 budget. There was $600,000 transferred from the reserve fund for general operating expenses in one year. But there was no missing money, he said. “Every year the city has an audit contracted through an independent certified public accounting firm,” Shields said of Kenneth Cooper CPA Accounting Firm.“Well, you answered my question,” Wetta said.Shields said in years past, in order to maintain the mill levy at current status, the council was told reserves would have to be used in order to do so with no real explanation. Those funds were used for general operating expenses going to departments like fire and police.“I think there have been unfair innuendos leveled at the council when we made a conscious decision every year to determine whether or not to raise the mill levy,” said John Brand, Wellington Council member.Valentine then asked why Wellington Financial Advisor John Haas said in a work session a couple of weeks ago that $1.5 million was recorded as a loss, and when asked what happened to those funds, he said, ‘I don’t know.’Shields said it is not his job or responsibility of Haas to know where the money went. His job is to determine the city’s debt ratio coverage and the overall financial health of the city. He determined that the utility reserves fund is being diminished, but it is not up to him to know how that money is spent.Council member Jan Korte said she doesn’t believe there are any missing funds. Council member B.J. Tracy reiterated what Shields said that both the general and utility fund were audited annually and that is paid for by the city. There was no need for an independent audit.Follow us on Twitter. Close Forgot password? Please put in your email: Send me my password! Close message Login This blog post All blog posts Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through… RSS Feed Subscribe via email Subscribe Subscribe to this blog’s comments through… RSS Feed Subscribe via email Subscribe Follow the discussion Comments (49) Logging you in… Close Login to IntenseDebate Or create an account Username or Email: Password: Forgot login? Cancel Login Close Username or Email: Password: Lost your password? Cancel Login Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout Logged in as Admin Options Disable comments for this page Save Settings Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity Loading comments… You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input. +18 Vote up Vote down credence · 279 weeks ago I think what needs to be done going forward is a better explanation by the city as to how our money is being spent. Back approximately 12 – 15 years ago the “utility reserve” had a balance of over $13 million dollars and I think this is what Councilman Valentine is referring to in his request. If the funds were used to offset tax increases then I feel the citizens of Wellington should be told this is what it was used for so rumors or misunderstandings don’t become accusations. We, as the citizens and taxpayers, have a right to know where and how our money is being spent, whether from a “reserve account” or general outlays.. Report Reply 1 reply · active 279 weeks ago -23 Vote up Vote down Wheat · 279 weeks ago I question If Roy eckert has the experience to deal with this complex utility crisis. The Minutes on the city website seem to confirm eckert has been to 5 housing authority meetings that effects the lives of 100 residents but has been to 0 Health Care authority Meetings that effect the health care of at least 15,000 citizens, Report Reply 1 reply · active 279 weeks ago +13 Vote up Vote down craig · 279 weeks ago Then post the audits where *we* can see where it went and for what. Good job, Mr. Valentine. Keep digging. That is not “chump change” … we’re talking a boatload of cash – our cash. Either stay on budget or show us *above the table” where the errors are and where our cash has gone. Let us decide if it’s ok or not. Failure to 2nd the motion just smells more than a little weird. Report Reply 1 reply · active 279 weeks ago -22 Vote up Vote down Guest · 279 weeks ago I am not impressed with Roy Eckert, where did the city council get this guy? Report Reply 0 replies · active 279 weeks ago +8 Vote up Vote down guest · 279 weeks ago We were supposed to get a refund from Westar. Do we have it yet? Report Reply 0 replies · active 279 weeks ago +7 Vote up Vote down Guest · 279 weeks ago The people need to know where every penny, the city spends Report Reply 0 replies · active 279 weeks ago +22 Vote up Vote down CueballSumnernewscow 94p · 279 weeks ago Did anyone read my article I wrote a couple of weeks ago on this very subject? Judging from the comments, obviously not. Report Reply 0 replies · active 279 weeks ago +6 Vote up Vote down craig · 279 weeks ago Tracy, reading media reports does not an explanation make, despite cueball’s best intentions. Obviously, a lot of residents are not feeling okay with this amount of missing money and the lack of detail and transparency. The council’s terse responses and not wanting the books opened in a public – or investigative manner – is pretty su****ious. They brought this on themselves, sir. Report Reply 0 replies · active 279 weeks ago +10 Vote up Vote down casper · 279 weeks ago What is amazing about this is Valentine would have voted for or against any of these projects that would require money being moved. He calls for transparency but it is not like he is a new Comer to the council. Instead of calling for press conferences an audits how about we figure out as a whole what to do and the most economic way to do it. Also why not give the city manager a chance. He has even been here a year. Some of you are a little quick to judge.. Report Reply 0 replies · active 279 weeks ago +20 Vote up Vote down Reasonable Citizen · 279 weeks ago Tracy, they apparently did not read this one either. Your article clearly states that Mr. Shields advised where the money went, it was transferred to general fund to keep the city from raising the mill levy. The City already pays for an audit. Instead of throwing money for another audit, (which would likely be very expensive), the reasonable council members(and citizens) understand, there is no missing money or misappropriated money. City budgets are published and everything is above board, so get informed, but if you can not read a newscow article, its is doubtful you can read a budget or minutes from a meeting. Report Reply 1 reply · active 279 weeks ago 1234Next » Post a new comment Enter text right here! Comment as a Guest, or login: Login to IntenseDebate Login to Login to Twitter Go back Tweet this comment Connected as (Logout) Email (optional) Not displayed publicly. Name Email Website (optional) Displayed next to your comments. Not displayed publicly. If you have a website, link to it here. Posting anonymously. Tweet this comment Submit Comment Subscribe to None Replies All new comments Comments by IntenseDebate Enter text right here! Reply as a Guest, or login: Login to IntenseDebate Login to Login to Twitter Go back Tweet this comment Connected as (Logout) Email (optional) Not displayed publicly. Name Email Website (optional) Displayed next to your comments. Not displayed publicly. If you have a website, link to it here. Posting anonymously. Tweet this comment Cancel Submit Comment Subscribe to None Replies All new commentslast_img read more

Victory for England at women’s Home Internationals

first_img4 Sep 2012 Victory for England at women’s Home Internationals England successfully defended their title in the women’s Home Internationals at Cork, Ireland – winning by the narrowest of margins over Wales. The two teams met today in the title decider and, in a very close encounter, the match was halved. But England emerged as champions on countback, having won more individual games during the three-day tournament. England had earlier beaten Ireland 9-0 and Scotland 5-4, while Wales defeated both those teams by a scoreline of 6-3. Team captain Chris Pascall commented: “We knew it was going to be a very tough day and the match was very close, but we got the half and that was a good result. We’ve won the week and that’s all you can ask.” Today’s match was intensely tight, with both the foursomes and singles exactly shared. As the afternoon’s play unfolded Wales seemed to have the edge, with only two England players ahead at the halfway stage. But England toughed it out and secured the necessary half. Curtis Cup star Holly Clyburn, who was three up at the turn, powered on to win her game 6/4. British girls’ champion Georgia Hall – ranked third in the world – took the lead in her match for the first time on the 15th. She also quickly won the 16th to go two up and halved the 17th for her point. Norfolk’s Amber Ratcliffe completed a successful team debut by securing the half with her 3/2 win. The 16-year-old was never behind in her game, although she was pulled back to all square after 12. She responded by winning the next three holes, before halving the 16th. The team, captained by Chris Pacall, was: Holly Clyburn (Woodhall Spa), Gabriella Cowley (West Essex), Georgia Hall (Remedy Oak), Bronte Law (Bramhall), Alex Peters (Notts’ Ladies), Amber Ratcliffe (Royal Cromer), Emily Taylor (Hillside), Kelly Tidy (Royal Birkdale). Results England 4½ Wales 4½ Foursomes Georgia Hall and Emily Taylor beat Amy Boulden and Becky Harries 4/2 Holly Clyburn and Bronte Law halved with Chloe Williams and Katie Bradbury Alex Peters and Kelly Tidy lost to Gemma Bradbury and Jess Evans 2/1 Singles Tidy lost to Boulden 3/1 Hall beat Williams 2/1 Taylor lost to Katie Bradbury 1 down Clyburn beat Gemma Bradbury 6/4 Amber Ratcliffe beat Evans 3/2, Law lost to Harries 4/3 In the day’s other match Ireland beat Scotland 5-4 How they finished: 1st England 2½ pt (games won 18½) 2nd Wales   2½ pt (games won 16½) England retained the title on the tie-breaking, individual games won rule. 3rd Ireland 1pt 4th Scotland 0pt   England snatch last gasp victory over Scotland 05 September 2012 England snatched a last gasp victory over Scotland today in the women’s Home Internationals at Cork, Ireland. Now they go head to head with Wales tomorrow in the title decider. Norfolk’s Amber Ratcliffe and Curtis Cup player Bronte Law both fought back in the final two singles to secure the precious 1½ points required for the team’s 5-4 win. Captain Chris Pascall said afterwards: “It was nerve wracking, but a very good result in the end. We had to dig deep.” The score means England, the defending champions, have won both their matches so far. So too have Wales, who today beat Ireland 6-3.   England, who enjoyed a 9-0 clean sweep in their opening match against Ireland, conceded their first game points of the tournament in this morning’s foursomes. English champion Kelly Tidy and English strokeplay champion Alex Peters romped to a 7/5 win in their game, conceding just one hole in the match. But the Scots beat the pairing of Holly Clyburn and Bronte Law and held Georgia Hall and Emily Taylor to a draw. As the singles unfolded, scoring remained extremely tight. With the first four games decided, England had won two, courtesy of Kelly Tidy and Emily Taylor, while Scotland also took two. Then, as the final two matches moved into the closing stages the Scots appeared to have the upper hand. Amber Ratcliffe, making her debut for England at this level, was see-sawing: one down after losing 15 to a birdie, all square after 16, one down after losing 17 to another birdie. Then, from a difficult lie in thick rough by the 18th green she got up and down for par to win the hole and halve her game. The outcome of the match then depended on Bronte Law – and the Curtis Cup player delivered the victory. She was never in front in her match until she won the 17th to edge one up with one to play – and she went on to also win the 18th for a 2up victory. Results England 5, Scotland 4 Foursomes Georgia Hall (Remedy Oak) and Emily Taylor (Hillside) halved with Kelsey MacDonald and Rachael Watton Kelly Tidy (Royal Birkdale) and Alex Peters (Notts’ Ladies) bt Laura Murray and Alyson McKechin 7/5 Holly Clyburn (Woodhall Spa) and Bronte Law (Bramhall) lost to Eilidh Briggs and Jane Turner 3/2 Singles Hall lost to MacDonald 1 hole Tidy bt Briggs 3/1 Clyburn lost to Watton 6/5 Taylor bt Rachel Walker 7/5 Amber Ratcliffe (Royal Cromer) halved with Lauren Whyte Law bt Turner 2 holes Final matches tomorrow: 08.30 and 13.10 Scotland v Ireland 09.00 and 14.10 England v Wales How they stand: England 2pt, Wales 2pt, Scotland 0pt, Ireland 0pt.   England beat Ireland 9-0 at Home Internationals 04 September 2012 England made a flawless start to their defence of the women’s Home Internationals with a 9-0 victory over the hosts, Ireland, on the first day of the championship at Cork. “It was a great result,” said captain Chris Pascall, whose team includes world number four, Georgia Hall, and three members of the winning Curtis Cup side, Holly Clyburn, Bronte Law and Kelly Tidy. But, she was quick to point out that despite the scoreline, the players had to work for their wins. Their strength was on the undulating greens, which are drying out after three days of sunshine and becoming very quick. “The putting was good today,” said Chris. The players set the tone of the day with their clean sweep of the three morning foursomes. Kelly Tidy and Alex Peters lost the first hole but were four up at the turn; Georgia Hall and Emily Taylor, birdied the 16th and won the 17th for their point, while Holly Clyburn and Bronte Law chipped in twice as they made their way to the turn five up.   As the singles got underway, English champion Kelly Tidy demonstrated devastating form with an 8/7 victory which she sealed with an eagle three on the 11th.   She was steadily followed by her team-mates.  Georgia Hall, the British girls’ champion, and Emily Taylor, the English girls’ titleholder, were never behind in their games; Amber Ratcliffe and Holly Clyburn both trailed by one hole during the front nine, but both played the back nine strongly to secure their points. Meanwhile, Alex Peters staged an impressive fightback to keep the clean sheet. The English stroke play champion was four down after 10 holes, but won the next six in a row, before halving the 17th for a 2/1 win. “It was a fantastic comeback,” said Chris. In the day’s other match Wales beat Scotland 6-3. Tomorrow England play Scotland, while Ireland play Wales. England results Foursomes Kelly Tidy (Royal Birkdale) & Alex Peters (Notts Ladies’) beat Gillian O’Leary & Sarah Cunningham  4&3 Georgia Hall (Remedy Oak) & Emily Taylor (Hillside) beat Mary Dowling & Jessica Carty 3&1 Holly Clyburn (Woodhall Spa) & Bronte Law (Bramhall) beat Deirdre Smith & Chloe Ryan 4&3 Singles Tidy beat Maria Dunne  8&7 Hall beat Carty 3&2 Amber Ratcliffe (Royal Cromer)  beat Lucy Simpson 3&1 Clyburn beat O’Leary 3&2 Peters beat Smith 2&1 Taylor beat Cunningham 4&3 Image © Cal Carson Golf Agency Full details: www.lgu.orglast_img read more